TFTHE FILMREVIEW · 50K FRESH TAKES
How Selfish I Am! — poster
← ALL FRESH TAKES

SOURCE-LED EDITORIAL REVIEW

How Selfish I Am!: desire and what it disrupts.

How Selfish I Am! · 2013

A source-led reading of How Selfish I Am! as romance: desire, decision, documented consensus, and the counterpoint that shifts the conclusion.

THE FILM EDITORIAL DESKAugust 31, 2026308 WORDS
01

THEMATIC CENTER

desire
02

NARRATIVE PRESSURE

decision
03

FORM

romance
04

RECORD ANCHORS

lives · though · kumiko

The record for How Selfish I Am! yields three coordinates specific to its premise—lives, though, and kumiko. That vocabulary places desire at the center and gives decision its dominant tension. It establishes a documentary baseline, not a borrowed score; criticism must still ask what the form does with that material.

How Selfish I Am! brings desire into contact with decision through romance. That intersection is our Fresh Take: judge the premise less by its familiarity than by how precisely that combination makes its conflict legible. The existing editorial note adds this view: A sensitive, fully inhabited film whose direction lets emotion surface with precision.

How Selfish I Am! (2013) arrives with the coordinates of a romance film situated in 2010s cinema. The record credits Daigo Matsui with the direction and places Hiroyuki Onoue and Mei Kurokawa in the foreground. With a broad feature-length canvas, the useful question is not to invent an invisible intention, but to notice how these documented choices shape audience expectations before the first frame.

Read as romance, the film carries the pressure of decision. Desire matters less as a promise of fulfilment than as a disruptive force exposing the compromises that had held until now. The most precise critical test is therefore how one choice alters every option that follows. Small scale is not a lack of ambition. It can become a method of precision, capable of turning a presence, a silence, or a hesitation into a complete narrative event.

The counterpoint asks whether the object of desire is truly another person, or the possibility of another self. Instead of asking whether the film confirms the expected story of desire, the sharper question is whether it changes the person, place, or institution with the power to define it. The verdict shifts when silence stops being an absence and becomes the scene's most charged decision.

THE VERDICT, REFRAMED

The wager: listen to silence with the same attention given to a plot turn. Here, desire changes meaning under the pressure of decision.

THE DOCUMENTARY STARTING POINT

Even though Kumiko realizes that she won’t be able to patch things up with her former lover, she ends up preparing a meal for him. Though she lives only for going to the concerts of her favorite band, Mie curses her nonexistent luck when she’s forced to do overtime on the day of a concert. Although Tsuda somehow lives off of doing day labor, he does not have any friends and is unable to establish interaction with society. In his indolent lifestyle, Rikuo only knows how to express himself through violence. The clumsy lives of these characters intersect.

Original review by The Film Editorial Desk. No audience testimony or independent critic identity is fabricated.
Year
2013
Runtime
106 min
Direction
Daigo Matsui
Performers
Hiroyuki Onoue · Mei Kurokawa · Sosuke Ikematsu · Shunsuke Daitoh · Maho Yamada · Sei Ando