TFTHE FILMREVIEW · 50K FRESH TAKES
Monkey Business — poster
← ALL FRESH TAKES

SOURCE-LED EDITORIAL REVIEW

Monkey Business: family as a balance of power, against the grain.

Monkey Business · 2015

A source-led reading of Monkey Business as cinematic narrative: family ties, decision, documented consensus, and the counterpoint that shifts the conclusion.

THE FILM EDITORIAL DESKAugust 31, 2026316 WORDS
01

THEMATIC CENTER

family ties
02

NARRATIVE PRESSURE

decision
03

FORM

cinematic narrative
04

RECORD ANCHORS

orphanage · orphans · brutal

The record for Monkey Business yields three coordinates specific to its premise—orphanage, orphans, and brutal. That vocabulary places family ties at the center and gives decision its dominant tension. It establishes a documentary baseline, not a borrowed score; criticism must still ask what the form does with that material.

Monkey Business brings family ties into contact with decision through cinematic narrative. That intersection is our Fresh Take: judge the premise less by its familiarity than by how precisely that combination makes its conflict legible. The existing editorial note adds this view: A strong, singular piece of cinema driven by genuine directorial conviction.

Monkey Business (2015) arrives with the coordinates of a film familial film situated in 2010s cinema. The record credits Johan Nijenhuis with the direction and places Harry van Rijthoven and Wesley van Gaalen in the foreground. With a contained running time, the useful question is not to invent an invisible intention, but to notice how these documented choices shape audience expectations before the first frame.

Read as cinematic narrative, the film carries the pressure of decision. Family becomes less an automatic refuge than a system of debts, loyalties, and roles waiting to be renegotiated. The most precise critical test is therefore how one choice alters every option that follows. The strongest entry point is to treat the film as a connected series of decisions. Frame, duration, cast, and genre are not guarantees of success; they are the elements of a proposition whose coherence deserves examination.

The counterpoint asks not who belongs to the family, but who has the right to redefine its rules. Instead of asking whether the film confirms the expected story of family ties, the sharper question is whether it changes the person, place, or institution with the power to define it. The twist is to suspend the score long enough to see which of the film's decisions still resists the verdict.

THE VERDICT, REFRAMED

The takeaway: consider the film's choices before adopting the verdict around it. Here, family ties changes meaning under the pressure of decision.

THE DOCUMENTARY STARTING POINT

In an orphanage around the year 1900, the principal of an orphanage tries to earn some money by selling the orphans for child labour. The moment we step in the story one of the orphans, Wim, is about to be sold to a brutal man. The man wants Wim to go to the market with a little monkey to pickpocket people. By the time they get to the market, Wim succeeds in escaping with the monkey by hiding in an old canalboat with the help of Jet, a girl who lives at the countryside. When they arrive at the farm where Jet lives, he meets Jets little sister Sien and her friend Ot, two little children who will take care of Wim and the monkey for the next weeks. When the brutal man finally finds out the hiding place of Wim, a true chase follows and Wim is locked up in the orphanage again. But then Jet’s father, a schoolteacher, interferes…. A story for the whole family about the start of the compulsory school attendance in 3D!

Original review by The Film Editorial Desk. No audience testimony or independent critic identity is fabricated.
Year
2015
Runtime
91 min
Direction
Johan Nijenhuis
Performers
Harry van Rijthoven · Wesley van Gaalen · Guus Dam · Tygo Bussemakers · Kim-Lian van der Meij · Loek Peters · Arjan Ederveen · Yvon Jaspers