TFTHE FILMREVIEW · 50K FRESH TAKES
That Which is About Us — poster
← ALL FRESH TAKES

SOURCE-LED EDITORIAL REVIEW

That Which is About Us: beyond the familiar story of choice.

That Which is About Us · 2014

A source-led reading of That Which is About Us as cinematic narrative: choice, decision, documented consensus, and the counterpoint that shifts the conclusion.

THE FILM EDITORIAL DESKAugust 31, 2026316 WORDS
01

THEMATIC CENTER

choice
02

NARRATIVE PRESSURE

decision
03

FORM

cinematic narrative
04

RECORD ANCHORS

digital · piece · number

The record for That Which is About Us yields three coordinates specific to its premise—digital, piece, and number. That vocabulary places choice at the center and gives decision its dominant tension. It establishes a documentary baseline, not a borrowed score; criticism must still ask what the form does with that material.

That Which is About Us brings choice into contact with decision through cinematic narrative. That intersection is our Fresh Take: judge the premise less by its familiarity than by how precisely that combination makes its conflict legible. The existing editorial note adds this view: A strong, singular piece of cinema driven by genuine directorial conviction.

That Which is About Us (2014) arrives with the coordinates of a cinema film situated in 2010s cinema. The record credits Alexander Dupuis with the direction and places its documented performers in the foreground. With an unusually compact form, the useful question is not to invent an invisible intention, but to notice how these documented choices shape audience expectations before the first frame.

Read as cinematic narrative, the film carries the pressure of decision. The story presents a connected set of decisions whose coherence matters more than their compliance with a familiar formula. The most precise critical test is therefore how one choice alters every option that follows. Categories help audiences find a work, but they can also limit attention. This reading keeps the label at a distance long enough to see how the film builds its own logic and which expectations it chooses to displace.

The counterpoint suspends the score long enough to identify the precise choice that continues to resist the verdict. Instead of asking whether the film confirms the expected story of choice, the sharper question is whether it changes the person, place, or institution with the power to define it. Moving beyond the obvious means locating the tension that turns familiar elements into a particular voice.

THE VERDICT, REFRAMED

The wager: let the work reveal its coherence before classifying it. Here, choice changes meaning under the pressure of decision.

THE DOCUMENTARY STARTING POINT

The audiovisual engine behind this piece uses a digital adaptation of the ""raster scanning"" method. The digital implementation initially ran into some unexpected limitations: the number of pixels onscreen for the duration of one frame significantly exceeds the number of audio samples played for the equivalent duration. However, I found the resulting distortions to be an especially interesting part of the process, eventually building the program for that which is about us around the distortions from translating a digital sound to an image and back in this particular fashion. Much like That Which Pulls, this piece develops in relation to points of harmonic resonance, but in this case we witness the sounds and images circling these resonances together.

Original review by The Film Editorial Desk. No audience testimony or independent critic identity is fabricated.
Year
2014
Runtime
10 min
Direction
Alexander Dupuis
Performers
—